Howard v. Equifax Information Services, LLC
Kentucky Western District Court | |
Judge: | Rebecca Grady Jennings |
Case #: | 3:25-cv-00051 |
Nature of Suit | 480 Other Statutes - Consumer Credit |
Cause | 28:1441 Petition for Removal |
Case Filed: | Jan 23, 2025 |
Case in other court: | Hardin Circuit Court, 24-CI-02194 |
Last checked: Thursday Jan 23, 2025 5:07 PM EST |
Defendant
Equifax Information Services, LLC
|
Represented By
|
Plaintiff
Christopher Howard
|
Represented By
|
Docket last updated: 02/04/2025 11:59 PM EST |
Friday, January 31, 2025 | ||
7 | 7
![]() AGREED ORDER FOR EXTENSION OF TIME Signed by Judge Rebecca Grady Jennings on 1/31/2025 granting5 Proposed Agreed Order. Equifax's time to answer, move, or otherwise respond to the Complaint in this action is extended through and including 3/3/2025, and any such responsive pleading by that date shall be deemed timely filed. cc: Counsel (SMJ) |
|
Thursday, January 30, 2025 | ||
6 | 6
![]() Corporate Disclosure Statement (pursuant to Rule 7.1(a)) identifying Corporate Parent Equifax, Inc. for Equifax Information Services, LLC; filed by Equifax Information Services, LLC. (Williams, John) |
|
5 | 5
![]() Proposed Agreed Order of Extension of Time by Equifax Information Services, LLC. (Williams, John) |
|
Thursday, January 23, 2025 | ||
4 | 4
![]() NOTICE of Deficiency re1 Notice of Removal. Reason for Deficiency: Rule 7.1(a)(1) and/or Rule 7.1(a)(2) disclosure statement(s) not filed. Failure to comply will be brought to the attention of the Court. Response due by 1/30/2025. (MNM) |
|
3 | 3
![]() CLERK'S NOTICE re1 Notice of Removal. cc: Counsel of Record, Hardin Circuit Court (MNM) |
|
2 | 2
![]() Case Assignment (Random Selection): Case Assigned to Judge Rebecca Grady Jennings. (MNM) |
|
1 | 1
![]() NOTICE OF REMOVAL by Equifax Information Services, LLC from Hardin Circuit Court, case number 24-CI-02194. (Filing fee $405, receipt number AKYWDC-4179186) Notice to counsel: Pursuant to LR 81.1(a), the removing party must electronically file any portion of the state court record it considers relevant to the removed action that the removing party did not file at the time of removal pursuant to 28 U.S.C. 1446(a). Pursuant to LR 81.1(b), any motion that remains pending in state court at the time of removal that the movant wishes the District Court to rule upon must be refiled in the District Court case within 14 days after removal. (MNM) |
|
Att: 1
![]() |
||
Att: 2
![]() |