DOE et al v. OFFICE OF PERSONNEL MANAGEMENT
| District Of Columbia District Court | |
| Case #: | 1:25-cv-00234 |
| Nature of Suit | 890 Other Statutes - Other Statutory Actions |
| Cause | 05:551 Administrative Procedure Act |
| Case Filed: | Jan 27, 2025 |
| Last checked: Tuesday Jan 28, 2025 2:49 AM EST |
|
Defendant
OFFICE OF PERSONNEL MANAGEMENT
1900 E Street NW
Washington, DC 20415 |
|
|
Plaintiff
JANE DOE, 1
|
Represented By
|
|
Plaintiff
JANE DOE, 2
|
Represented By
|
| Docket last updated: 6 hours ago |
| Thursday, January 30, 2025 | ||
| 3 | 3
Ex Parte MOTION for Leave to File Complaint Using "Jane Does 1-2" in Violation of LCvR 5.1(c) re1 Complaint, by JANE DOE, 1, JANE DOE, 2.(McClanahan, Kelly)
|
|
|
Att: 1
Exhibit A - McClanahan declaration,
|
||
|
Att: 2
Text of Proposed Order
|
||
| Wednesday, January 29, 2025 | ||
|
order
Order on Motion for Miscellaneous Relief Set/Reset Deadlines
Wed 01/29 4:44 PM
MINUTE ORDER: The Court ORDERS that: 1) Plaintiffs'2 Motion to Proceed Under Pseudonym is DENIED WITHOUT PREJUDICE as it does not address the five-factor inquiry that applies to such motions, see In re Sealed Case , 971 F.3d 324, 326-27 (D.C. Cir. 2020); 2) Within fourteen days of the Court's Order, Plaintiffs shall file either a new Motion that addresses the factors identified in In re Sealed Case or a Notice advising the Clerk of the Court whether they wish to proceed under their true names, and, if so, they shall also file their2 Motion on the public docket; and 3) If Plaintiffs do not file a new Motion or such Notice within fourteen days, the Clerk is directed to terminate the case. The factors identified in In re Sealed Case are:1 whether the justification asserted by the requesting party is merely to avoid the annoyance and criticism that may attend any litigation or is to preserve privacy in a matter of a sensitive and highly personal nature;2 whether identification poses a risk of retaliatory physical or mental harm to the requesting party or, even more critically, to innocent non-parties; 3 the ages of the persons whose privacy interests are sought to be protected; 4 whether the action is against a governmental or private party; and, relatedly, 5 the risk of unfairness to the opposing party from allowing an action against it to proceed anonymously. So ORDERED by Chief Judge James E. Boasberg on 1/29/2025. (lcjeb4) |
||
| MINUTE ORDER: The Court ORDERS that: 1) Plaintiffs'2 Motion to Proceed Under Pseudonym is DENIED WITHOUT PREJUDICE as it does not address the five-factor inquiry that applies to such motions, see In re Sealed Case , 971 F.3d 324, 326-27 (D.C. Cir. 2020); 2) Within fourteen days of the Court's Order, Plaintiffs shall file either a new Motion that addresses the factors identified in In re Sealed Case or a Notice advising the Clerk of the Court whether they wish to proceed under their true names, and, if so, they shall also file their2 Motion on the public docket; and 3) If Plaintiffs do not file a new Motion or such Notice within fourteen days, the Clerk is directed to terminate the case. The factors identified in In re Sealed Case are:1 whether the justification asserted by the requesting party is merely to avoid the annoyance and criticism that may attend any litigation or is to preserve privacy in a matter of a sensitive and highly personal nature;2 whether identification poses a risk of retaliatory physical or mental harm to the requesting party or, even more critically, to innocent non-parties;3 the ages of the persons whose privacy interests are sought to be protected; 4 whether the action is against a governmental or private party; and, relatedly, 5 the risk of unfairness to the opposing party from allowing an action against it to proceed anonymously. So ORDERED by Chief Judge James E. Boasberg on 1/29/2025. (lcjeb4) | ||
| Tuesday, January 28, 2025 | ||
| 2 | 2
motion
Miscellaneous Relief
Tue 01/28 9:50 AM
MOTION to Proceed Under Pseudonym by JANE DOE, 1, JANE DOE, 2.(McClanahan, Kelly) Modified on 1/29/2025 to correct event type and docket entry text (zsl). |
|
|
Att: 1
Exhibit A - McClanahan declaration,
|
||
|
Att: 2
Text of Proposed Order
|
||
|
notice
Notice of Error- New Case
Tue 01/28 9:15 AM
NOTICE OF NEW CASE ERROR regarding1 Complaint,. The following error(s) need correction: Noncompliance with LCvR 5.1(c). Please file a Notice of Errata stating the error and attach the corrected initiating pleading to include the name & full residence address of each party and file using the event Errata. Other - No Motion to Proceed Under Pseudonym is filed. COMPLIANCE DEADLINE is by close of business today. This case will not proceed any further until all errors are satisfied. (zmtm) |
||
| Monday, January 27, 2025 | ||
| 1 | 1
9
pgs
cmp
Complaint
Mon 01/27 9:52 PM
COMPLAINT (Class Action) against OFFICE OF PERSONNEL MANAGEMENT ( Filing fee $ 405 receipt number ADCDC-11436090) filed by JANE DOE, 1, JANE DOE, 2.(McClanahan, Kelly) |
|
|
Att: 1
Civil Cover Sheet,
|
||
|
Att: 2
Summons,
|
||
|
Att: 3
Summons,
|
||
|
Att: 4
Summons
|
||