Singh v. Topline NYC Contracting Inc. et al
| New York Eastern District Court | |
| Judge: | Natasha C Merle |
| Referred: | Vera M Scanlon |
| Case #: | 1:25-cv-00776 |
| Nature of Suit | 710 Labor - Fair Labor Standards Act |
| Cause | 18:1962 Racketeering (RICO) Act |
| Case Filed: | Feb 11, 2025 |
| Last checked: Tuesday Feb 11, 2025 2:05 PM EST |
|
Defendant
Gurpreet Singh
|
|
|
Defendant
Lakhvinder Singh
|
|
|
Defendant
Topline NYC Contracting Inc.
|
|
|
Defendant
Topline NYC Inc.
|
|
|
Plaintiff
Joginder Singh
|
Represented By
|
| Docket last updated: 02/20/2025 11:59 PM EST |
| Wednesday, February 12, 2025 | ||
| 5 | 5
order
Scheduling Order
Wed 02/12 5:02 PM
SCHEDULING ORDER: An initial conference is scheduled for 6/12/2025 at 10:30 AM before Magistrate Judge Vera M. Scanlon via ZoomGov. To gain access to the ZoomGov audio conferencing system, counsel and/or any pro se parties are to dial 1-646-828-7666; enter meeting ID 16121901090 and press the pound key; when asked for a participant ID, press the pound key; and enter passcode 091622 and press the pound key. Please note that your microphone will be automatically muted when you enter the virtual conference room. If another conference is underway, please remain on mute until the case is called. At that time, you may unmute your microphone by pressing *6 on your keypad. The parties must complete the attached Joint Proposed Case Management Plan (CMP) and file it on ECF no later than 6/2/2025. As to any Defendant who or which has not appeared by today's date, Plaintiff(s) must mail a copy of this Order, its attachment and the full public docket to each last known mailing address for each such Defendant and file proof of service on ECF within ten days of the date of this Order. The Court reminds the parties of their responsibility to file a disclosure statement under Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 7.1 within 30 days of appearing in this action, if applicable and if they have not yet done so. As to any LLC, the disclosure statement should identify all of the members and their respective citizenships. Ordered by Magistrate Judge Vera M. Scanlon on 2/12/2025. (SH) |
|
| Tuesday, February 11, 2025 | ||
| 4 | 4
misc
Quality Control Check - Attorney Case Opening
Tue 02/11 3:47 PM
This attorney case opening filing has been checked for quality control. See the attachment for corrections that were made, if any. (SDM) |
|
| 3 | 3
misc
Clerks Notice of Rule 73
Tue 02/11 3:46 PM
Clerk's Notice Re: Consent. A United States Magistrate Judge has been assigned to this case and is available to conduct all proceedings. In accordance with Rule 73 of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure, Local Rule 73.1, the parties are notified that if all parties consent, the assigned Magistrate Judge is available to conduct all proceedings in this action including a (jury or nonjury) trial and to order the entry of a final judgment. Attached to this Notice is a blank copy of the consent form that should be filled out, signed and filed electronically only if all parties wish to consent. Any party may withhold its consent without adverse substantive consequences. Do NOT return or file the consent unless all parties have signed the consent.The form may also be accessed at the following link:[LINK:https://img.nyed.uscourts.gov/files/forms/MJConsentForm.pdf] (SDM) |
|
| 2 | 2
service
Summons Issued
Tue 02/11 3:45 PM
Summons Issued as to Gurpreet Singh, Lakhvinder Singh, Topline NYC Contracting Inc., Topline NYC Inc.. (SDM) |
|
| 1 | 1
28
pgs
cmp
Complaint
Tue 02/11 1:26 PM
COMPLAINT against Gurpreet Singh, Lakhvinder Singh, Topline NYC Contracting Inc., Topline NYC Inc. Was the Disclosure Statement on Civil Cover Sheet completed -YES,, filed by Joginder Singh. (Kataev, Emanuel) |
|
|
Att: 1
Civil Cover Sheet,
|
||
|
Att: 2
Proposed Summons
|
||
|
misc
Civil Case Filing Fee
Tue 02/11 1:36 PM
CIVIL CASE FILING FEE: $ 405, receipt number ANYEDC-18754639 (Kataev, Emanuel) |
||
|
utility
Case Assigned/Reassigned
Tue 02/11 3:43 PM
Case Assigned to Judge Natasha C. Merle and Magistrate Judge Vera M. Scanlon. Please download and review the Individual Practices of the assigned Judges, located on our[LINK:website] . Attorneys are responsible for providing courtesy copies to judges where their Individual Practices require such. (SDM) |
||