Restrepo v. Tru-Val Electric Corporation
New York Eastern District Court | |
Judge: | Brian M Cogan |
Case #: | 1:25-cv-00801 |
Nature of Suit | 791 Labor - Employee Retirement Income Security Act |
Cause | 29:1132 E.R.I.S.A.-Employee Benefits |
Case Filed: | Feb 12, 2025 |
Terminated: | Feb 13, 2025 |
Last checked: Wednesday Feb 12, 2025 12:06 PM EST |
Petitioner
Humberto Restrepo
|
Represented By
|
Respondent
Tru-Val Electric Corporation
|
Docket last updated: 02/20/2025 11:59 PM EST |
Thursday, February 13, 2025 | ||
order
~Util - Terminate Civil Case
Thu 02/13 11:55 AM
Civil Case Terminated as per voluntary dismissal. (RG) |
||
Wednesday, February 12, 2025 | ||
9 | 9
![]() NOTICE of Voluntary Dismissal by Humberto Restrepo (Grancio, Adrianna) |
|
8 | 8
![]() SCHEDULING ORDER: A telephonic Initial Status Conference is set for 3/26/2025 at 10:00 am. The parties are directed to call 571-353-2301 and enter Meeting ID 949146687#. See attached mandatory requirements for the conference. Ordered by Judge Brian M. Cogan on 2/12/2025. (PW) |
|
7 | 7
![]() Letter MOTION to Stay the instant action pursuant to Section 362(a)(1) of the Bankruptcy Code. 11 U.S.C. § 362 by Humberto Restrepo. (Grancio, Adrianna) |
|
6 | 6
![]() Summons Issued as to Tru-Val Electric Corporation. (KD) |
|
5 | 5
![]() This attorney case opening filing has been checked for quality control. See the attachment for corrections that were made, if any. (KD) |
|
4 | 4
![]() MEMORANDUM in Support re1 Petition re: Arbitration Award, filed by Humberto Restrepo. (Grancio, Adrianna) |
|
3 | 3
![]() Proposed Summons. Re1 Petition re: Arbitration Award, by Humberto Restrepo (Grancio, Adrianna) |
|
2 | 2
![]() Civil Cover Sheet.. by Humberto Restrepo (Grancio, Adrianna) |
|
1 | 1
![]() PETITION re: Arbitration Award , filed by Humberto Restrepo. (Grancio, Adrianna) |
|
Att: 1
![]() |
||
Att: 2
![]() |
||
Att: 3
![]() |
||
Att: 4
![]() |
||
Att: 5
![]() |
||
Att: 6
![]() |
||
Att: 7
![]() |
||
Att: 8
![]() |
||
misc
Civil Case Filing Fee
Wed 02/12 11:53 AM
CIVIL CASE FILING FEE: $ 405, receipt number ANYEDC-18758428 (Grancio, Adrianna) |
||
utility
Case Assigned/Reassigned
Wed 02/12 1:20 PM
Case Assigned to Judge Brian M. Cogan. Please download and review the Individual Practices of the assigned Judges, located on our[LINK:website] . Attorneys are responsible for providing courtesy copies to judges where their Individual Practices require such. (KD) |
||
ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE re:7 . It is not a justification for filing a lawsuit in violation of the automatic stay that a creditor's statute of limitations is about to expire, as the Bankruptcy Code itself extends the statute of limitations in that situation as of the petition date (see 11 U.S.C. § 108(c). The proper procedure to have followed would have been to file a proof of claim or adversary proceeding in the bankruptcy court, not to start a fresh proceeding here post-bankruptcy filing. Plaintiff is therefore ORDERED TO SHOW CAUSE by 2/19/2025 why this action should not be dismissed as having been filed in violation of the automatic stay, 11 U.S.C. § 362(a). Ordered by Judge Brian M. Cogan on 2/12/2025. (PW) (Entered: 02/12/2025) | ||
order
Order to Show Cause
Wed 02/12 5:26 PM
ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE re:7 . It is not a justification for filing a lawsuit in violation of the automatic stay that a creditor's statute of limitations is about to expire, as the Bankruptcy Code itself extends the statute of limitations in that situation as of the petition date (see 11 U.S.C. § 108(c). The proper procedure to have followed would have been to file a proof of claim or adversary proceeding in the bankruptcy court, not to start a fresh proceeding here post-bankruptcy filing. Plaintiff is therefore ORDERED TO SHOW CAUSE by 2/19/2025 why this action should not be dismissed as having been filed in violation of the automatic stay, 11 U.S.C. § 362(a). Ordered by Judge Brian M. Cogan on 2/12/2025. (PW) |