Simuel v. Williams et al.
| Ohio Northern District Court | |
| Judge: | Pamela A Barker |
| Case #: | 1:25-cv-00277 |
| Nature of Suit | 440 Civil Rights - Other Civil Rights |
| Cause | 28:1983 Civil Rights |
| Case Filed: | Feb 12, 2025 |
| Last checked: Wednesday Feb 12, 2025 5:06 PM EST |
|
Defendant
Algart
|
|
|
Defendant
Canal Point
|
|
|
Defendant
City View
|
|
|
Defendant
Cleveland Clinic
|
|
|
Defendant
Select Specialty
|
|
|
Defendant
Don Williams
|
|
|
Plaintiff
Albert Simuel
1420 Lakeview Ave.
Cleveland, OH 44112 |
| Docket last updated: 02/21/2025 11:59 PM EST |
| Wednesday, February 12, 2025 | ||
| 2 | 2
motion
Proceed In Forma Pauperis
Wed 02/12 4:20 PM
Motion to proceed in forma pauperis filed by Plaintiff Albert Simuel. (H,Ch) |
|
| 1 | 1
10
pgs
cmp
Complaint
Wed 02/12 4:16 PM
Complaint against All Defendants. Filing fee not paid, IFP. Filed by Albert Simuel.. (H,Ch) |
|
|
Att: 1
Receipts,
|
||
|
Att: 2
Envelope
|
||
|
utility
Add and Terminate Judge
Wed 02/12 4:19 PM
Judge Pamela A. Barker assigned to case. (H,Ch) |
||
|
oth_evt
Random Assignment of Magistrate Judge
Wed 02/12 4:19 PM
Random Assignment of Magistrate Judge pursuant to Local Rule 3.1. In the event of a referral, case will be assigned to Magistrate Judge Reuben J. Sheperd. (H,Ch) |
||
|
oth_evt
Remark re Civil Cover Sheet Remark re Pro Se Service
Wed 02/12 4:22 PM
Remark by Clerk: This case was assigned and processed without the filing of a Civil Cover Sheet, which is required by Local Rule 3.13(a). Without the Civil Cover Sheet, the Clerk does not know if this case is related to or is a refiling of a pending/terminated case in this Court., Copy of1 Complaint and blank Civil Cover Sheet mailed to Albert Simuel at 1420 Lakeview Ave., Cleveland, OH 44112 on 2/12/2025. Related document(s)1 . (H,Ch) |
||
|
order
Order
Wed 02/12 4:25 PM
Order [non-document] Counsel and the parties are hereby advised that this Court will not accept ex parte telephone calls to Chambers regarding substantive issues in pending cases. The Court speaks through its docket. While it may be appropriate to call Chambers regarding routine, non-substantive matters (such as requests for the dial in information for an upcoming status conference, etc.), it is not appropriate under any circumstances for counsel to call Chambers ex parte for guidance or clarification regarding substantive matters, including matters relating to existing case management deadlines, requests to file briefing, and/or inquiries regarding the status of pending motions. All questions regarding substantive matters in pending cases must be filed as a motion on the public docket, with the following exception. If a dispute arises during a deposition that requires this Court's immediate assistance, the parties may call Chambers for assistance, but must do so jointly (and not on an ex parte basis). Judge Pamela A. Barker on 2/12/2025. (P,K) |
||