Williams v. Chan et al
| New York Southern District Court | |
| Judge: | John G Koeltl |
| Case #: | 1:25-cv-01225 |
| Nature of Suit | 550 Prisoner Petitions - Habeas Corpus - Civil Rights |
| Cause | 42:1983 Prisoner Civil Rights |
| Case Filed: | Feb 07, 2025 |
Create an account to get the full party report for this case.
| Docket last updated: 4 hours ago |
| Thursday, February 20, 2025 | ||
|
misc
Mailing Receipt
Thu 02/20 11:12 AM
MAILING RECEIPT: Document No: 5. Mailed to: LaQuan Williams ID:372469 Hudson County Correctional Facility 35 Hackensack Avenue Kearny, NJ 07032. (ne) |
||
| Wednesday, February 19, 2025 | ||
| 5 | 5
3
pgs
order
Order Directing Prisoner Authorization
Wed 02/19 3:02 PM
ORDER DIRECTING PRISONER AUTHORIZATION: Plaintiff, who is currently incarcerated at Hudson County Correctional Facility, brings this action prose. To proceed with a civil action in this Court, a prisoner must either pay $405.00 in fees - a $350.00 filing fee plus a $55.00 administrative fee - or request permission to proceed in forma pauperis (IFP), that is, without prepayment of fees, submit a signed IFP application and a prisoner authorization. See 28 U.S.C. §§ 1914, 1915. If the Court grants a prisoner's IFP application, the Prison Litigation Reform Act requires the Court to collect the $350.00 filing fee in installments deducted from the prisoner's account. See 28 U.S.C. § 1915(b)(l). A prisoner seeking to proceed in this Court without prepayment of fees must therefore also authorize the Court to withdraw these payments from his account by filing a "prisoner authorization," which directs the facility where the prisoner is incarcerated to deduct the $350.00 filing fee from the prisoner's account in installments and to send to this Court certified copies of the prisoner's account statements for the past six months. See 28 U.S.C. § 1915(a)(2), (b). Plaintiff submitted an IFP application but did not submit a prisoner authorization. Within thirty days of the date of this order, Plaintiff must either pay the $405.00 in fees or complete and submit the attached prisoner authorization. If Plaintiff submits the prisoner authorization, it should be labeled with docket number 25-CV-1225 (JGK). No summons shall issue at this time. If Plaintiff complies with this order, the case shall be processed in accordance with the procedures of the Clerk's Office. If Plaintiff fails to comply with this order within the time allowed, the action will be dismissed without prejudice. The Court certifies under 28 U.S.C. § 1915(a)(3) that any appeal from this order would not be taken in good faith, and therefore IFP status is denied for the purpose of an appeal. Cf Coppedge v. United States, 369 U.S. 438, 444-45 (1962) (holding that appellant demonstrates good faith when seeking review of a nonfrivolous issue). SO ORDERED. Prisoner Authorization Form due by 3/21/2025. (Signed by Judge John G. Koeltl on 2/19/2025) (tg) |
|
| Friday, February 14, 2025 | ||
|
notice
Notice of Case Assignment/Reassignment
Fri 02/14 11:55 AM
NOTICE OF CASE REASSIGNMENT to Judge John G. Koeltl. Judge Unassigned is no longer assigned to the case. (vba) |
||
|
utility
Case Designation
Fri 02/14 11:56 AM
Magistrate Judge Stewart D. Aaron is designated to handle matters that may be referred in this case. Pursuant to 28 U.S.C. Section 636(c) and Fed. R. Civ. P. 73(b)(1) parties are notified that they may consent to proceed before a United States Magistrate Judge. Parties who wish to consent may access the necessary form at the following link:[LINK:https://nysd.uscourts.gov/sites/default/files/2018-06/AO-3.pdf] . (vba) |
||
| Thursday, February 13, 2025 | ||
|
misc
Mailing Receipt
Thu 02/13 11:11 AM
MAILING RECEIPT: Document No: 3. Mailed to: LaQuan Williams ID:372469 Hudson County Correctional Facility 35 Hackensack Avenue Kearny, NJ 07032. (anc) |
||
| Wednesday, February 12, 2025 | ||
| 3 | 3
order
Standing Order re Cases Filed By Pro Se Plaintiffs
Wed 02/12 9:56 AM
STANDING ORDER IN RE CASES FILED BY PRO SE PLAINTIFFS (See 24-MISC-127 Standing Order filed March 18, 2024). To ensure that all cases heard in the Southern District of New York are handled promptly and efficiently, all parties must keep the court apprised of any new contact information. It is a party's obligation to provide an address for service; service of court orders cannot be accomplished if a party does not update the court when a change of address occurs. Accordingly, all self-represented litigants are hereby ORDERED to inform the court of each change in their address or electronic contact information. Parties may[LINK:consent to electronic service] to receive notifications of court filings by email, rather than relying on regular mail delivery. Parties may also ask the court for[LINK:permission to file documents electronically] . Forms, including instructions for consenting to electronic service and requesting permission to file documents electronically, may be found by clicking on the hyperlinks in this order, or by accessing the forms on the courts website, nysd.uscourts.gov/forms. The procedures that follow apply only to cases filed by pro se plaintiffs. If the court receives notice from the United States Postal Service that an order has been returned to the court, or otherwise receives information that the address of record for a self-represented plaintiff is no longer valid, the court may issue an Order to Show Cause why the case should not be dismissed without prejudice for failure to comply with this order. Such order will be sent to the plaintiffs last known address and will also be viewable on the court's electronic docket. A notice directing the parties' attention to this order shall be docketed (and mailed to any self-represented party that has appeared and has not consented to electronic service) upon the opening of each case or miscellaneous matter that is classified as pro se in the court's records. (Signed by Judge Laura Taylor Swain on 03/18/2024) (sac) |
|
|
service
Note Regarding Service on Self-Represented Party
Wed 02/12 9:55 AM
CASE MANAGEMENT NOTE: For each electronic filing made in a case involving a self-represented party who has not consented to electronic service, the filing party must serve the document on such self-represented party in a manner permitted by Fed. R. Civ. P. 5(b)(2) (other than through the ECF system) and file proof of service for each document so served. Please see[LINK:Rule 9.2] of the courts ECF Rules & Instructions for further information. (sac) |
||
| Friday, February 07, 2025 | ||
| 2 | 2
misc
Request to Proceed In Forma Pauperis
Wed 02/12 9:47 AM
REQUEST TO PROCEED IN FORMA PAUPERIS. Document filed by LaQuan Williams. (sac) |
|
| 1 | 1
cmp
Complaint
Wed 02/12 9:46 AM
COMPLAINT against Daniel Alessandrino, Andrew Chan, John Doe, John Doe, John Dole. Document filed by LaQuan Williams. (sac) |
|
|
utility
Case Designated ECF
Wed 02/12 9:51 AM
Case Designated ECF. (sac) |
||