Crispin v. State of New York et al
| New York Western District Court | |
| Judge: | John L Sinatra, Jr |
| Case #: | 1:25-cv-00173 |
| Nature of Suit | 440 Civil Rights - Other Civil Rights |
| Cause | 42:1983 Civil Rights Act |
| Case Filed: | Feb 25, 2025 |
| Last checked: Tuesday Feb 25, 2025 2:08 PM EST |
|
Defendant
Cattaraugus County
|
|
|
Defendant
Cattaraugus County Sheriff's Office
|
|
|
Defendant
State of New York
|
|
|
Defendant
Unknown Law Enforcement Officers
|
|
|
Plaintiff
Gary Crispin
8890 Cottage Rd.
South Dayton, NY 14138 |
| Docket last updated: 8 hours ago |
| Tuesday, February 25, 2025 | ||
| 2 | 2
motion
Proceed In Forma Pauperis
Tue 02/25 12:36 PM
MOTION for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis by Gary Crispin. (CGJ) |
|
| 1 | 1
cmp
Complaint
Tue 02/25 12:35 PM
COMPLAINT against Cattaraugus County, Cattaraugus County Sheriff's Office, State of New York, Unknown Law Enforcement Officers, filed by Gary Crispin. (CGJ) |
|
|
utility
Remark
Tue 02/25 12:36 PM
Remark: Plaintiff has been given a pro se packet including a privacy notice, consent to proceed before a Magistrate Judge, Pro Se Assistance Program Information, Civil Case Timeline and ADR Notification. (CGJ) |
||
|
adr
Automatic Referral to Mediation
Tue 02/25 12:37 PM
AUTOMATIC REFERRAL TO MEDIATION Pursuant to Section 2.1(A) of the Plan for Alternative Dispute Resolution in the United States District Court for the Western District of New York (the ADR Plan), this case is automatically referred to ADR. To access the ADR Plan and for inquiries regarding the Court's ADR Program please review the Court's[LINK:ADR webpage] and/or contact the Court's ADR Administrator at[LINK:adrprogram@nywd.uscourts.gov] . Prior to the Local Rule 16 scheduling conference, counsel and unrepresented parties shall review the [LINK:ADR Plan] and confer with each other regarding ADR for this case. Unless the parties agree to a different intervention, it is presumed they will participate in mediation. The parties shall be prepared to report on the outcome of their ADR discussion at the scheduling conference, as the initial Scheduling Order for this case will establish ADR deadlines in accordance with the ADR Plan.(CGJ) |
||