Leone v. La Salle County Jail et al
Illinois Central District Court | |
Judge: | Colleen R Lawless |
Case #: | 3:25-cv-03051 |
Nature of Suit | 550 Prisoner Petitions - Habeas Corpus - Civil Rights |
Cause | 42:1983 Prisoner Civil Rights |
Case Filed: | Feb 25, 2025 |
Terminated: | Apr 03, 2025 |
Create an account to get the full party report for this case.
Docket last updated: 04/25/2025 11:59 PM CDT |
Monday, April 21, 2025 | ||
4 | 4
![]() Mail Returned as Refused, re2 Notice of Case Opening, Complaint Packet and 2/28/25 Text Order. (ANW) |
|
Thursday, April 03, 2025 | ||
3 | 3
![]() JUDGMENT IN A CIVIL CASE. (JS) |
|
order
Order Dismissing Case
Thu 04/03 9:18 AM
TEXT ORDER entered by Judge Colleen R. Lawless 4/2/25. The Court dismissed Plaintiff's pleading but granted him until March 31, 2025, to file an amendment. The deadline expired, but Plaintiff neither filed an amended pleading as instructed nor moved to extend the time to comply. Accordingly, this case is DISMISSED without prejudice. The Clerk of the Court is DIRECTED to record this case as a potential strike against Plaintiff on the Court's three-strikes list under the Prison Litigation Reform Act.(JS) |
||
Friday, February 28, 2025 | ||
2 | 2
![]() NOTICE OF CASE OPENING. Please be advised that your case has been assigned to Judge Colleen Lawless. Effective immediately, all documents should be mailed or scanned to the Springfield Division, 600 E Monroe, Springfield,IL 62701.Merit Review Deadline set for 3/20/2025.(KE) |
|
Att: 1
![]() |
||
order
Order ~Util - Set/Reset Deadlines
Fri 02/28 1:22 PM
TEXT ORDER entered by Judge Colleen R. Lawless on 2/28/2025. Plaintiff Christopher Leone, a La Salle County Jail detainee, filed a largely incomprehensible document1 in this Court. Plaintiff's filing seeks certification programs, grants, and education and job skills training but neither names Defendants nor provides facts that establish or permit the inference that an individual acting under color of state law deprived him of a constitutional right. Estate of Perry v. Wenzel, 872 F.3d 439, 452 (7th Cir. 2017). As a result, Plaintiff's filing does not comply with Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 8(a)(2), which mandates a pleading contain a "short and plain statement of the claim showing that [he] is entitled to relief." To the extent Plaintiff intended to file a Complaint, the Court GRANTS Plaintiff thirty days from the entry of this Order to file an Amended Complaint. If Plaintiff elects to do so, his amended pleading must specify the constitutional violation, when it occurred, and the Defendant or Defendants personally involved. See Gentry v. Duckworth, 65 F.3d 555, 561 (7th Cir. 1995) ("To recover damages under Sec 1983, a plaintiff must establish that a defendant was personally responsible for the deprivation of a constitutional right."). If Plaintiff does not file an amended pleading before the deadline expires or does not request an extension of time to comply BEFORE the deadline expires, the Court will dismiss his case. The Clerk of the Court is DIRECTED to send Plaintiff the Court's Complaint and Petition to Proceed in forma pauperis forms. Accordingly, Plaintiff filing1 is dismissed for failure to state a plausible claim for relief. (KE) |
||
Tuesday, February 25, 2025 | ||
1 | 1
![]() COMPLAINT against All Defendants, filed by Christopher Leone.(KE) |