The Estate of Lord Treyshun Gardner v. Google, Inc.
Kentucky Western District Court | |
Judge: | Rebecca Grady Jennings |
Case #: | 3:25-cv-00129 |
Nature of Suit | 440 Civil Rights - Other Civil Rights |
Cause | 28:1441nr Notice of Removal |
Case Filed: | Mar 04, 2025 |
Case in other court: | Jefferson Circuit Court, 25-CI-00363 |
Last checked: Tuesday Mar 04, 2025 2:08 PM EST |
Defendant
Google,Inc
|
Represented By
|
Plaintiff
The Estate of Lord Treyshun Gardner
|
Docket last updated: 03/12/2025 11:59 PM EDT |
Tuesday, March 11, 2025 | ||
7 | 7
![]() MOTION to Dismiss Complaint by Defendant Google,Inc (Greenwald, Bart) |
|
Att: 1
![]() |
||
Wednesday, March 05, 2025 | ||
misc
Filing Fee Received
Wed 03/05 11:52 AM
Filing fee: $ 405.00 receipt number 300011326 re6 Notice of Deficiency by The Estate of Lord Treyshun Gardner. (SLK) |
||
Tuesday, March 04, 2025 | ||
6 | 6
![]() NOTICE of Deficiency re1 Notice of Removal. Reason for Deficiency: Filing Fee to Be Paid In Full. Failure to comply will be brought to the attention of the Court. Response due by 3/11/2025. (MNM) |
|
5 | 5
![]() Corporate Disclosure Statement and Diversity Disclosure Statement (pursuant to Rule 7.1(a)) identifying Corporate Parent XXVI Holdings, Inc., Corporate Parent Alphabet, Inc. for Google,Inc; filed by Google,Inc. (Greenwald, Bart) |
|
4 | 4
![]() CLERK'S NOTICE re1 Notice of Removal. cc: Counsel, Jefferson Circuit Court (HMC) |
|
3 | 3
![]() NOTICE of Deficiency re1 Notice of Removal. Reason for Deficiency: Rule 7.1(a)(1) and Rule 7.1(a)(2) disclosure statements not filed. Failure to comply will be brought to the attention of the Court. Response due by 3/18/2025. (HMC) |
|
2 | 2
![]() Case Assignment (Random Selection): Case Assigned to Judge Rebecca Grady Jennings. (HMC) |
|
1 | 1
![]() NOTICE OF REMOVAL from Jefferson Circuit Court, case number 25-CI-00363 filed by Google, Inc. Notice to counsel: Pursuant to LR 81.1(a), the removing party must electronically file any portion of the state court record it considers relevant to the removed action that the removing party did not file at the time of removal pursuant to 28 U.S.C. 1446(a). Pursuant to LR 81.1(b), any motion that remains pending in state court at the time of removal that the movant wishes the District Court to rule upon must be refiled in the District Court case within 14 days after removal. (HMC) |
|
Att: 1
![]() |
||
Att: 2
![]() |
||
Att: 3
![]() |