Assaf v. United States Department of Homeland Security et al
California Central District Court | |
Judge: | David O Carter |
Referred: | Autumn D Spaeth |
Case #: | 8:25-cv-00479 |
Nature of Suit | 899 Other Statutes - Administrative Procedure Act/Review or Appeal of Agency Decision |
Cause | 05:551 Administrative Procedure Act |
Case Filed: | Mar 12, 2025 |
Last checked: Wednesday Mar 12, 2025 11:05 AM PDT |
Defendant
Secretary KRISTI NOEM
UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF HOMELAND SECURITY
Washington, DC 20528 |
|
Defendant
Santa Ana Field Office
|
|
Defendant
Kika Scott
|
|
Defendant
UNITED STATES CITIZENSHIP AND IMMIGRATION SERVICES
5900 Capital Gateway Drive Mail Stop 2120
Camp Springs, MD 20588 |
|
Defendant
United States Department of Homeland Security
United States Attorney's Office 300 N. Los Angeles Street 7th Floor
Los Angeles, CA 90012 |
|
Defendant
Trung Vo
|
|
Plaintiff
Fadi Assaf
|
Represented By
|
Docket last updated: 11 hours ago |
Monday, March 24, 2025 | ||
21 | 21
![]() PROOF OF SERVICE Executed by Plaintiff Fadi Assaf, upon Defendant Trung Vo served on 3/21/2025, answer due 5/20/2025. Service of the Summons and Complaint were executed upon the United States Attorneys Office by delivering a copy to civil process clerk. Executed upon the Attorney Generals Office of the United States by delivering a copy to civil process clerk. Executed upon the officer agency or corporation by delivering a copy to civil process clerk. Service was executed in compliance with Federal Rules of Civil Procedure. Due diligence declaration NOT attached. Registered or certified mail return receipt attached. (Khatib, Salah) |
|
20 | 20
![]() PROOF OF SERVICE Executed by Plaintiff Fadi Assaf, upon Defendant United States Citizenship and Immigration Services served on 3/21/2025, answer due 5/20/2025. Service of the Summons and Complaint were executed upon the United States Attorneys Office by delivering a copy to civil process clerk. Executed upon the Attorney Generals Office of the United States by delivering a copy to civil process clerk. Executed upon the officer agency or corporation by delivering a copy to civil process clerk. Service was executed in compliance with Federal Rules of Civil Procedure. Due diligence declaration NOT attached. Registered or certified mail return receipt attached. (Khatib, Salah) |
|
19 | 19
![]() PROOF OF SERVICE Executed by Plaintiff Fadi Assaf, upon Defendant Kika Scott served on 3/21/2025, answer due 5/20/2025. Service of the Summons and Complaint were executed upon the United States Attorneys Office by delivering a copy to civil process clerk. Executed upon the Attorney Generals Office of the United States by delivering a copy to civil process clerk. Executed upon the officer agency or corporation by delivering a copy to civil process clerk. Service was executed in compliance with Federal Rules of Civil Procedure. Due diligence declaration NOT attached. Registered or certified mail return receipt attached. (Khatib, Salah) |
|
18 | 18
![]() PROOF OF SERVICE Executed by Plaintiff Fadi Assaf, upon Defendant Santa Ana Field Office served on 3/21/2025, answer due 5/20/2025. Service of the Summons and Complaint were executed upon the United States Attorneys Office by delivering a copy to civil process clerk. Executed upon the Attorney Generals Office of the United States by delivering a copy to civil process clerk. Executed upon the officer agency or corporation by delivering a copy to civil process clerk. Service was executed in compliance with Federal Rules of Civil Procedure. Due diligence declaration NOT attached. Registered or certified mail return receipt attached. (Khatib, Salah) |
|
17 | 17
![]() PROOF OF SERVICE Executed by Plaintiff Fadi Assaf, upon Defendant Kristi Noem served on 3/21/2025, answer due 5/20/2025. Service of the Summons and Complaint were executed upon the United States Attorneys Office by delivering a copy to civil process clerk. Executed upon the Attorney Generals Office of the United States by delivering a copy to civil process clerk. Executed upon the officer agency or corporation by delivering a copy to civil process clerk. Service was executed in compliance with Federal Rules of Civil Procedure. Due diligence declaration NOT attached. Registered or certified mail return receipt attached. (Khatib, Salah) |
|
16 | 16
![]() PROOF OF SERVICE Executed by Plaintiff Fadi Assaf, upon Defendant United States Department of Homeland Security served on 3/21/2025, answer due 5/20/2025. Service of the Summons and Complaint were executed upon the United States Attorneys Office by delivering a copy to civil process clerk. Executed upon the Attorney Generals Office of the United States by delivering a copy to civil process clerk. Executed upon the officer agency or corporation by delivering a copy to civil process clerk. Service was executed in compliance with Federal Rules of Civil Procedure. Due diligence declaration NOT attached. Registered or certified mail return receipt attached. (Khatib, Salah) |
|
Friday, March 14, 2025 | ||
15 | 15
![]() INITIAL STANDING ORDER FOLLOWING ASSIGNMENT OF CIVIL CASE TO JUDGE CARTER. (pd) |
|
Thursday, March 13, 2025 | ||
14 | 14
![]() 60 DAY Summons Issued re Complaint (Attorney Civil Case Opening)1 as to Defendants Kristi Noem, Santa Ana Field Office, Kika Scott, United States Citizenship and Immigration Services, United States Department of Homeland Security, Trung Vo. (lh) |
|
Att: 1
![]() |
||
Att: 2
![]() |
||
Att: 3
![]() |
||
Att: 4
![]() |
||
Att: 5
![]() |
||
13 | 13
![]() NOTICE OF DEFICIENCIES in Attorney Case Opening RE: Civil Cover Sheet (CV-71)2 . The following error(s) was found: The caption on the document uploaded to the docket entry number referenced above does not match the case information on the docket (e.g., case title, case number, document name, etc.). The Court may 1)order an amended or corrected document to be filed, 2)order the document stricken, or 3)take other action the Court deems appropriate. You may file a Notice of Errata attaching a corrected version of the document, but you are not required to take any action to correct this deficiency unless the Court so directs. (lh) |
|
12 | 12
![]() Notice to Counsel Re Consent to Proceed Before a United States Magistrate Judge. (lh) |
|
11 | 11
![]() NOTICE TO PARTIES OF COURT-DIRECTED ADR PROGRAM filed. (lh) |
|
10 | 10
![]() NOTICE OF ASSIGNMENT to District Judge David O. Carter and Magistrate Judge Autumn D. Spaeth. (lh) |
|
Wednesday, March 12, 2025 | ||
9 | 9
![]() Request for Clerk to Issue Summons on Complaint (Attorney Civil Case Opening)1 filed by plaintiff Fadi Assaf. (Khatib, Salah) |
|
8 | 8
![]() Request for Clerk to Issue Summons on Complaint (Attorney Civil Case Opening)1 filed by plaintiff Fadi Assaf. (Khatib, Salah) |
|
7 | 7
![]() Request for Clerk to Issue Summons on Complaint (Attorney Civil Case Opening)1 filed by plaintiff Fadi Assaf. (Khatib, Salah) |
|
6 | 6
![]() Request for Clerk to Issue Summons on Complaint (Attorney Civil Case Opening)1 filed by plaintiff Fadi Assaf. (Khatib, Salah) |
|
5 | 5
![]() Request for Clerk to Issue Summons on Complaint (Attorney Civil Case Opening)1 filed by plaintiff Fadi Assaf. (Khatib, Salah) |
|
4 | 4
![]() Request for Clerk to Issue Summons on Complaint (Attorney Civil Case Opening)1 filed by plaintiff Fadi Assaf. (Khatib, Salah) |
|
3 | 3
![]() NOTICE of Interested Parties filed by Plaintiff Fadi Assaf, (Khatib, Salah) |
|
2 | 2
![]() CIVIL COVER SHEET filed by Plaintiff Fadi Assaf. (Khatib, Salah) |
|
1 | 1
![]() COMPLAINT Receipt No: ACACDC-39281279 - Fee: $405, filed by plaintiff Fadi Assaf. (Attorney Salah O. Khatib added to party Fadi Assaf(pty:pla))(Khatib, Salah) |