Courthouse News Service v. Ciccone
| Ohio Northern District Court | |
| Judge: | Pamela A Barker |
| Case #: | 4:25-cv-00590 |
| Nature of Suit | 440 Civil Rights - Other Civil Rights |
| Cause | 42:1983 Civil Rights Act |
| Case Filed: | Mar 25, 2025 |
| Last checked: Tuesday Mar 25, 2025 2:06 PM EDT |
|
Defendant
Michael P. Ciccone
|
|
|
Plaintiff
Courthouse News Service
|
Represented By
|
| Docket last updated: 9 hours ago |
| Tuesday, March 25, 2025 | ||
| 4 | 4
notice
Attorney Appearance (atty event)
Tue 03/25 2:57 PM
Attorney Appearance by Griffin R. Reyelts filed by on behalf of Courthouse News Service. |
|
| 3 | 3
oth_evt
Summons Issued
Tue 03/25 2:14 PM
Original Summons and Magistrate Consent Form issued to counsel for service upon Michael P. Ciccone. (D,Ju) |
|
|
Att: 1
Magistrate Consent Form
|
||
| 2 | 2
notice
Corporate Disclosure Statement (atty event)
Tue 03/25 2:08 PM
Corporate Disclosure Statement filed by Courthouse News Service. (Greiner, John) |
|
| 1 | 1
23
pgs
cmp
Complaint
Tue 03/25 1:41 PM
Complaint for Declaratory and Injunctive Relief against Michael P. Ciccone. Filing fee paid $ 405, Receipt number AOHNDC-13020078. Filed by Courthouse News Service. (Greiner, John) |
|
|
Att: 1
Exhibit A - Administrative Order for the E-Filing of Civil Cases,
|
||
|
Att: 2
Exhibit B - Mont. Co. Rule 2.06 Filing Sealed Documents,
|
||
|
Att: 3
Exhibit C - Letter from J. Greiner to Mahoning Clerk of Courts,
|
||
|
Att: 4
Exhibit D - Email from Mahoning Clerk of Courts to J. Greiner,
|
||
|
Att: 5
Civil Cover Sheet,
|
||
|
Att: 6
Summons
|
||
|
utility
Add and Terminate Judge
Tue 03/25 2:04 PM
Judge Pamela A. Barker assigned to case. (D,Ju) |
||
|
oth_evt
Random Assignment of Magistrate Judge
Tue 03/25 2:05 PM
Random Assignment of Magistrate Judge pursuant to Local Rule 3.1. In the event of a referral, case will be assigned to Magistrate Judge Jennifer Dowdell Armstrong. (D,Ju) |
||
|
order
Order
Tue 03/25 2:10 PM
Order [non-document] Counsel and the parties are hereby advised that this Court will not accept ex parte telephone calls to Chambers regarding substantive issues in pending cases. The Court speaks through its docket. While it may be appropriate to call Chambers regarding routine, non-substantive matters (such as requests for the dial in information for an upcoming status conference, etc.), it is not appropriate under any circumstances for counsel to call Chambers ex parte for guidance or clarification regarding substantive matters, including matters relating to existing case management deadlines, requests to file briefing, and/or inquiries regarding the status of pending motions. All questions regarding substantive matters in pending cases must be filed as a motion on the public docket, with the following exception. If a dispute arises during a deposition that requires this Court's immediate assistance, the parties may call Chambers for assistance, but must do so jointly (and not on an ex parte basis). Judge Pamela A. Barker on 3/25/2025. (P,K) |
||