Bradley v. Monsanto Company
Consolidated
Lead case: 3:16-md-02741
Lead case: 3:16-md-02741
California Northern District Court | |
Judge: | Vince Chhabria |
Case #: | 3:25-cv-03181 |
Nature of Suit | 365 Torts - Personal Injury - Product Liability |
Cause | 28:1332 Diversity-Product Liability |
Case Filed: | Apr 09, 2025 |
Case in other court: | New York Western, 6:25-cv-06149 |
Last checked: Friday Apr 11, 2025 8:03 PM PDT |
Defendant
Monsanto Company
|
|
Plaintiff
Linda Bradley
|
Represented By
|
Docket last updated: 04/13/2025 11:59 PM PDT |
Thursday, April 10, 2025 | ||
utility
MDL Member Case
Thu 04/10 10:28 AM
MEMBER CASE OPENED: Western District of New York, 6:25-cv-06149-FPG, Bradley v. Monsanto Company, Opened in California Northern District as 3:25-cv-03181-VC pursuant to Conditional Transfer Order CTO-510 cc: JPMDL (slh, COURT STAFF) |
||
Wednesday, April 09, 2025 | ||
4 | 4
![]() Case transferred in from District of New York Western; Case Number 6:25-cv-06149. Original file certified copy of transfer order and docket sheet received. |
|
3 | 3
![]() |
|
Tuesday, March 25, 2025 | ||
ATTENTION ALL PARTIES OR INTERVENORS: Pursuant to Fed. R. Civ. P. 7.1 and/or General Order No. 157 In the Matter of Disclosure of Members, Shareholders, Partners, and Leaders of Business Organization Parties, all Disclosure Statements are to be filed with first appearance, pleading, petition, motion, response, or other request addressed to the court. (KM) | ||
Monday, March 24, 2025 | ||
2 | 2
![]() |
|
Case Assigned to Hon. Frank P. Geraci, Jr. Notification to Chambers of on-line civil case opening. (TMK) | ||
AUTOMATIC REFERRAL TO MEDIATION Pursuant to Section 2.1(A) of the Plan for Alternative Dispute Resolution in the United States District Court for the Western District of New York (the ADR Plan), this case is automatically referred to ADR. To access the ADR Plan and for inquiries regarding the Court's ADR Program please review the Court's[LINK:ADR webpage] and/or contact the Court's ADR Administrator at[LINK:adrprogram@nywd.uscourts.gov] . Prior to the Local Rule 16 scheduling conference, counsel and unrepresented parties shall review the [LINK:ADR Plan] and confer with each other regarding ADR for this case. Unless the parties agree to a different intervention, it is presumed they will participate in mediation. The parties shall be prepared to report on the outcome of their ADR discussion at the scheduling conference, as the initial Scheduling Order for this case will establish ADR deadlines in accordance with the ADR Plan. (TMK) | ||
Notice of Availability of Magistrate Judge: A United States Magistrate of this Court is available to conduct all proceedings in this civil action in accordance with 28 U.S.C. 636c and FRCP 73. The Notice, Consent, and Reference of a Civil Action to a Magistrate Judge form (AO-85) is available for download at[LINK:http://www.uscourts.gov/services-forms/forms] . (TMK) | ||
Original Summons Not Submitted (TMK) | ||
Notified Multi-District Litigation Panel of potential tag-along case. (TMK) | ||
Friday, March 21, 2025 | ||
1 | 1
![]() |
|
Att: 1
![]() |