USA v. Sanchez Diaz
| California Southern District Court | |
| Case #: | 3:25-mj-01779 |
| Case Filed: | Apr 14, 2025 |
| Last checked: Thursday Apr 17, 2025 1:20 AM PDT |
|
Defendant
Jose Luis Sanchez Diaz (1)
|
Represented By
|
|
Plaintiff
USA
|
Represented By
|
| Docket last updated: 04/17/2025 4:01 AM PDT |
| Sunday, April 13, 2025 | ||
| Arrest of Jose Luis Sanchez Diaz (no document attached) (ecf) | ||
| Monday, April 14, 2025 | ||
| 1 | 1
COMPLAINT as to Jose Luis Sanchez Diaz.(ecf)
|
|
|
Att: 1
Info Sheet
|
||
| 2 | 2 Set/Reset Duty Hearings as to Jose Luis Sanchez Diaz: Initial Appearance set for 4/14/2025 before Magistrate Judge Michael S. Berg. (no document attached) (fjp) | |
| 3 | 3
NOTICE OF ATTORNEY APPEARANCE Brendan Barber appearing for USA. (Barber, Brendan)Attorney Brendan Barber added to party USA(pty:pla) (exs).
|
|
| 4 | 4 Minute Entry for proceedings held before Magistrate Judge Michael S. Berg: Initial Appearance as to Jose Luis Sanchez Diaz held on 4/14/2025. Attorney Nancy Bryn Rosenfeld (N/A) appointed for Jose Luis Sanchez Diaz. Detention Hearing as to Jose Luis Sanchez Diaz held on 4/14/2025. USA oral motion for detention; motion granted as to Jose Luis Sanchez Diaz. Defendant ordered detained without prejudice. Order of detention to be filed by Court. Preliminary Hearing set for 4/24/25 @ 1:30 PM before Magistrate Judge Michael S. Berg. Arraignment set for 5/13/25 @ 1:30 PM before Magistrate Judge Michael S. Berg. (Interpreter Paula Navarro). (CD# 4/14/2025 MSB 305; 425-429). (Plaintiff Attorney Connor Veneski AUSA). (Defendant Attorney Carmel Abuzaid FD). (ecf) | |
| 6 | 6
ORDER OF DETENTION as to Jose Luis Sanchez Diaz. Signed by Magistrate Judge Michael S. Berg on 4/14/2025. (ave)
|
|
| 7 | 7
ORDER as to Jose Luis Sanchez Diaz: The Court orders the United States to comply with the continuing duty to disclose evidence which is favorable to the defendant as required by Brady v. Maryland, 373 U.S. 83 (1963), and its progeny. Upon finding that the government has failed to comply with this order, the Court may, as appropriate, order the production of such information, grant a continuance, impose evidentiary sanctions, or, in extreme cases, dismiss charges.. Signed by Magistrate Judge Michael S. Berg on 4/14/25. (aje)
|
|