Douglas O'Connor, et al v. Uber Technologies, Inc.
Original Case: 3:13-cv-03826
| Ninth Circuit U.S. Court of Appeals | |
| Case #: | 0:15-23f-80169 |
| Type | 23(f) petition / private (pet perm appeal) |
| Case Filed: | Sep 16, 2015 |
| Terminated: | Nov 17, 2015 |
| Last checked: Thursday Sep 17, 2015 10:03 AM PDT |
|
Defendant - Petitioner
UBER TECHNOLOGIES, INC.
|
Represented By
|
|
Plaintiff - Respondent
DOUGLAS O'CONNOR, individually and on behalf of all others similarly situated
|
Represented By
|
|
Plaintiff - Respondent
THOMAS COLOPY, individually and on behalf of all others similarly situated
|
Represented By
|
|
Plaintiff - Respondent
MATTHEW MANAHAN, individually and on behalf of all others similarly situated
|
Represented By
|
|
Plaintiff - Respondent
ELIE GURFINKEL, individually and on behalf of all others similarly situated
|
Represented By
|
| 1. | Uber is fighting back against the class-action lawsuit that threatens to reclassify its drivers as employees (businessinsider.com) |
| Submitted Thu 09/17/2015 | |
| Docket last updated: 09/17/2015 10:03 AM PDT |
| Tuesday, September 15, 2015 | ||
| 1 | 1 FILED ON 09/15/2015 PETITION FOR PERMISSION TO APPEAL PURSUANT TO RULE 23(f). SERVED ON 09/15/2015. [9684409] (HC) [Entered: 09/16/2015 09:07 AM] | |
Att: 1
1 pgs
Docketing Letter
|
||
|
Att: 2
98 pgs
23(f) Petition
|
||
|
Att: 3
8 pgs
form(s) sent
|
||