Howell et al v. Yale University
| Connecticut District Court | |
| Judge: | Janet C Hall |
| Referred: | Thomas O Farrish |
| Case #: | 3:22-cv-01160 |
| Nature of Suit | 442 Civil Rights - Employment |
| Cause | 42:1981 Civil Rights |
| Case Filed: | Sep 14, 2022 |
| Last checked: Monday Mar 13, 2023 5:38 AM EDT |
|
Defendant
Yale University
|
Represented By
|
|
Plaintiff
Todd Howell
|
Represented By
|
|
Plaintiff
N.E.S.A.I.M., LLC
|
Represented By
|
GPO
Jul 17 2023
ORDER granting 38 Motion for Attorney Fees. Signed by Judge Thomas O. Farrish on 7/17/23. (Wood, R.) |
|
|
GPO
Sep 26 2023
RULING: For the reasons stated above, Yale's Partial Motion to Dismiss (Doc. No. 12) is granted in part and denied in part, without prejudice to repleading, if the plaintiffs can plausibly allege causes of action consistent with this Ruling. SO ORDERED by Judge Janet C. Hall on 9/26/2023. (Sichanh, Christina) |
|
|
GPO
Mar 25 2024
ORDER: Ruling and Order on Defendant's Motion for Sanctions (Doc. No. 57 ), Defendant's Motion for Extension of Time (Doc. No. 69 ), and Plaintiff's Motion for Extension for Reinstatement (Doc. No. 89 ). Denying 57 Motion for Sanctions; granting in part and denying in part 69 Motion for Extension of Time, denying 89 Motion Reinstate Plaintiff.. Signed by Judge Janet C. Hall on 3/25/2024. (Barry, L.) |
| Docket last updated: 4 hours ago |
| Tuesday, February 11, 2025 | ||
| 123 | 123
order
Order on Motion to Dismiss
Tue 02/11 2:42 PM
ORDER: Defendant's Motion to Dismiss (Doc. No.102 ) is granted absent objection. Mr. Howell is the sole remaining plaintiff in this case. This Motion to Dismiss sought to dismiss Counts One, Two, and Three, which relate to a snow removal contract to which Mr. Howell was not a party. Mr. Howell has filed no opposition to the Motion to Dismiss and conceded in his Memorandum in Opposition to the defendant's Motion for Summary Judgement (Doc. No.117 ), that the only claim remaining in this case is one for intentional infliction of emotional distress. See Memorandum in Opposition (Doc. No.117 ) at 3. As such, the defendant's Motion to Dismiss (Doc. No.102 ) is granted. SO ORDERED by Judge Janet C. Hall on 2/11/2025. (DeRubeis, B.) |
|