LAUSD v. A. O.
Original Case: 2:21-cv-00757
| Ninth Circuit U.S. Court of Appeals | |
| Case #: | 0:22-cv-55204 |
| Type | civil / private |
| Nature of Suit | 448 Civil Rights - Education |
| Case Filed: | Feb 28, 2022 |
| Terminated: | Feb 15, 2024 |
| Last checked: Friday Feb 16, 2024 3:10 AM PST |
|
Amicus Curiae
EDUCATION LEGAL ALLIANCE OF THE CALIFORNIA SCHOOL BOARDS ASSOCIATION
|
Represented By
|
|
Amicus Curiae
COUNCIL OF PARENT ATTORNEYS AND ADVOCATES, INC.
|
Represented By
|
|
Amicus Curiae
DISABILITY RIGHTS LEGAL CENTER
|
Represented By
|
|
Amicus Curiae
LEARNING RIGHTS LAW CENTER
|
Represented By
|
|
Amicus Curiae
CALIFORNIA ASSOCIATION OF PARENT-CHILD ADVOCACY
|
Represented By
|
|
Defendant - Appellee
A. O., a minor, by and through her parents, Kateri and Alex Owens
|
Represented By
|
|
Plaintiff - Appellant
LOS ANGELES UNIFIED SCHOOL DISTRICT
|
Represented By
|
GPO
Feb 15 2024
FILED OPINION (MILAN D. SMITH, JR., DAVID F. HAMILTON and DANIEL P. COLLINS) The school district violated the IDEA in several ways: by failing to indicate clearly the frequency and duration of the services offered, by failing to offer A.O. a meaningful benefit, and by not placing her in the least restrictive environment appropriate for her. We AFFIRM the district court’s judgment on these issues. We REVERSE the district court’s finding that the individualized education program was not required to specify that A.O. would receive individual speech and language therapy. The case is REMANDED to the district court to modify its judgment accordingly and for any further appropriate proceedings consistent with this opinion. Opinion by Judge David F. Hamilton; Dissent by Judge Collins. FILED AND ENTERED JUDGMENT. [12860176] [22-55204, 22-55226] |
| Docket last updated: 02/16/2024 3:09 AM PST |
| Monday, February 28, 2022 | ||
| 1 | 1 DOCKETED CAUSE AND ENTERED APPEARANCES OF COUNSEL. SEND MQ: Yes. The schedule is set as follows: Appellant Los Angeles Unified School District Mediation Questionnaire due on 03/07/2022. Transcript ordered by 03/28/2022. Transcript due 04/26/2022. Appellant Los Angeles Unified School District opening brief due 06/06/2022. Appellee A. O. answering brief due 07/05/2022. Appellant's optional reply brief is due 21 days after service of the answering brief. [12381419] (JMR) [Entered: 02/28/2022 09:40 AM] | |
|
Att: 1
3 pgs
Docketing Letter and Briefing Schedule
|
||
|
Att: 2
2 pgs
Notice to all Parties and Counsel
|
||
|
Att: 3
1 pgs
Mediation Letter
|
||
|
Att: 4
22 pgs
Case Opening Packet
|
||
| 2 | 2 Terminated participation of Court Reporter Alana Ota in this case. [12381424] (JMR) [Entered: 02/28/2022 09:43 AM] | |
| 3 | 3 Entered appearance of Court Reporter Alberto V. Ortiz in this case. [12381425] (JMR) [Entered: 02/28/2022 09:43 AM] | |